Photo by Pexels.com

California Jury finds Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder Contained Asbestos, was Defective, and its Risks were “Known or Knowable” to the Company

News Provided By

Worthington & Caron, PC
Jan 18, 2019, 12:40 ET

SAN PEDRO, Calif., Jan. 18, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — Johnson & Johnson has been waging an all-out campaign to rehabilitate its image in the wake of a December 14, 2018 report by Reuters News finding the company knew for decades its iconic Baby Powder contained asbestos. When the story broke, J&J shares fell 10% in one day, translating into a $40 billion loss.

(PRNewsfoto/Worthington & Caron, PC)
(PRNewsfoto/Worthington & Caron, PC)
J&J ran full-page ads in newspapers across the country insisting its talc is safe and beneficial to use. According to the ad, “If we had any reasons to believe our talc was unsafe, it would be off our shelves.” In a video posted on J&J’s website, Chairman and CEO Alex Gorsky added, “Since tests for asbestos in talc were first developed, J&J’s Baby Powder has never contained asbestos.”

For its part, Reuters has stood by its reporting, citing multiple tests from 1971 to the early 2000s finding asbestos in Johnson’s Baby Powder and talc from mines which supplied J&J.

The battle now playing out in the media is the same battle that has been waged over recent years in courtrooms between J&J and users of its talc products who developed mesothelioma, a deadly cancer caused by asbestos.

One such case involved Carla Allen, a 51-year-old Corvallis, Oregon residential real estate professional and mother of a college student and Navy serviceman. Carla was a lifetime user of talc products. Her mother powdered her with Johnson’s Baby Powder as an infant. She received gifts of perfume-scented powders as a child. An avid swimmer, the talcs she used for skin irritation from chlorine became part of her daily routine. Coming full circle, she powdered her own children with Johnson’s Baby Powder as infants.

Carla was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in December 2017. She sought treatment near her home in Portland and was advised her cancer was untreatable. She traveled to Los Angeles to treat with Dr. Robert Cameron, thoracic surgeon, surgical oncologist, and director of the Comprehensive Mesothelioma Program at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. She had a lung-sparing pleurectomy-decortication surgery performed by Dr. Cameron, followed by a combination of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and cryoablation.

A lawsuit was brought on Carla’s behalf in Eureka, California by the Worthington & Caron, PC and Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC law firms. Defendants included manufacturers and suppliers of the four brands of talc products Carla used throughout her life, including Johnson’s Baby Powder. After settling with some defendants, the case proceeded to trial against J&J.

At trial, J&J’s defense was essentially the same as their response to the Reuters News story. Through the testimony of corporate representatives and highly paid professional expert witnesses, J&J adamantly denied its Baby Powder ever contained asbestos and steadfastly maintained the product is safe.

Is J&J Baby Powder Safe?

What Sayeth the Jury?

10 Number of Verdicts

2 Safe

4 Carcinogenic

4 Hung

Number of the verdicts in the U.S, from 2016 to present.

Carla’s trial team, led by attorney David Greenstone, presented reams of evidence extracted from J&J through contentious pre-trial discovery in this and prior cases. In fact, some of the key evidence cited in the Reuters report was uncovered by Mr. Greenstone’s firm.

Company documents showed that historic testing of Johnson’s Baby Powder by J&J, its consultants, and numerous other entities, repeatedly revealed that the product contained asbestos. Plaintiff’s experts who conducted their own testing confirmed the presence of asbestos in Johnson’s Baby Powder and its source talc. The types of asbestos found were Chrysotile, Tremolite, and Anthophyllite.

“The biggest challenge in these cases is proving the product contained asbestos,” Mr. Greenstone explained. “J&J has spent decades attacking and attempting to ‘compromise’ any researcher who finds asbestos in their products. They worked with the cosmetics industry to oppose more sensitive asbestos testing methods. They have also resorted to ‘moving the goal line’ by using such a restrictive definition of ‘asbestos’ that whenever asbestos is found in their Baby Powder, they can claim it’s not really ‘asbestos.’ All of this can be extremely confusing for juries, the public, and regulatory agencies.”

At the conclusion of trial on November 30, 2018, the jury agreed that the Johnson’s Baby Powder Carla used contained asbestos. The jury also found that J&J’s iconic Baby Powder contained a “manufacturing defect” and presented “potential risks that were known or knowable” by J&J.

The jury’s findings rank as a major victory in the campaign to compel J&J to acknowledge the truth about its talc products.

The jury ultimately chose not to impose damages. J&J lawyers seized upon latitude in court rulings allowing their experts to speculate about other potential exposures, such as a Johns Manville plant located 20 miles from her father’s workplace. Unfortunately, this tactic proved successful. The jury found, despite Carla’s use of J&J’s defective asbestos-containing product, it did not cause her mesothelioma.

“We didn’t agree with the final outcome,” said attorney Roger Worthington. “But we applaud the jury for rejecting J&J’s legal and marketing defense. By finding that Johnson’s Baby Powder in fact contained asbestos, they sent a clear message that while J&J can fool regulators, they can’t fool the public, at least not for long.”

Asbestos litigation has a long and sordid history of asbestos product manufacturers trying to cover up their misdeeds. We believe it will ultimately be proven that J&J is just the latest example. But for now, the battles continue, in the media, through thoughtful reporting like the Reuters News article, and in the courts, through courageous victims like Carla Allen and the dedicated advocates who represent them.

Contact:
1-800-831-9399
www.worthingtoncaron.com

SOURCE Worthington & Caron, PC

Related Links

Worthington & Caron, PC: Asbestos Lawyers for Life

A mesothelioma cancer diagnosis can change your life in an instant. At Worthington & Caron, we are driven by a singular passion – to empower persons battling mesothelioma. People who have asbestos cancer want hope; they want to live. Our goal as asbestos attorneys is to be your trusted ally in the battle against your illness.

Check Also

SEC Files Charges in Elaborate Microcap Stock Fraud

“As alleged in our complaint, Magna Group and its co-defendants used fake debt instruments to unlawfully obtain shares in microcap companies, which they then dumped on unsuspecting retail investors,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, Senior Associate Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office. “This action demonstrates the resolve of the SEC in pursuing fraudsters who use elaborate financing schemes to engage in securities fraud.”

Investor Alert and Bulletin From SEC Office of Investor Education and Advocacy

Know how to be a better investor. Did you know that active trading and some other very common investing behaviors actually can undermine investment performance? According to researchers, other common investing mistakes include focusing on past performance, favoring investments from your own country, region, state, or company, and holding on to losing investments too long and selling winning investments too soon.

COURT ORDERS $1 BILLION JUDGMENT AGAINST OPERATORS OF WOODBRIDGE PONZI SCHEME TARGETING RETAIL INVESTORS

"This resolution accomplishes one of the SEC's core missions to protect retail investors," said Stephanie Avakian, Co-Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "Mr. Shapiro and other defendants will be held accountable and required to pay substantial penalties for their misconduct." "Our complaint charged that when Woodbridge's fictitious business model collapsed, the company stopped paying investors and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection," said Eric I. Bustillo, Director of the SEC's Miami Regional Office. "The settlement provides for the return of significant funds to investors."

SEC Charges Cognizant and Two Former Executives With FCPA Violations

“Bribery to further corporate goals is an illusory path to long-term success. While always the wrong choice, it is particularly egregious when senior executives chart that course for those they lead, as our complaint alleges here. We are committed to holding them accountable for their actions,” said Charles E. Cain, Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s FCPA Unit.

SEC Charges Four Public Companies With Longstanding ICFR Failures

According to the SEC’s orders, year after year, the four companies disclosed material weaknesses in ICFR involving certain high-risk areas of their financial statement presentation. As discussed in the SEC orders, each of the four companies took months, or years, to remediate their material weaknesses after being contacted by the SEC staff. One of the companies is still in the process of remediating its material weaknesses.

Teva Pharmaceutical Stock (TEVA) Trading Higher Today on FDA Approval of Its Seizure Drug Sabril for Adults and Pediatric Epilepsy Patients

Complex partial seizures, a common type of seizures, start in a specific area of the brain and can affect consciousness. Typically, complex partial seizures last between 30 and 90 seconds, and are often followed by a period of disorientation, confusion and/or fatigue.

Universal Technical Institute, Stock (UTI) Hits New 52 Week Highs as A Result of Converting Technical Career-Minded Students Into Highly Skilled Technicians and Entrepreneurs

The U.S. Department of Labor projects that, by 2026, there will be more than 1.2 million job openings in the automotive, diesel and collision repair industries. 1 To help reach that total, the transportation industry will need to fill more than 120,000 technician job openings annually, on average.

%d bloggers like this: